In the latest versions of ESLint, more and more formatting rules were
removed or declared deprecated. These rules have been integrated into
the new Stylistic package (https://eslint.style/guide/why) and expanded.
Stylistic acts as a better formatter for JavaScript as Prettier.
With this PR there are many changes that make the code more uniform, but
it may be difficult to review due to the large amount. Even if I have no
worries about the changes, perhaps this would be something for the
release after next.
Let me know what you think.
PR: #3113
I see this bugs:
AnimateCSS merge hide() and show() animated css class when we do
multiple call
--> result it will stay en hide state
I think event listener (is animateCSS file) is not a proper solution
I correct it with like traditional code with timer
Fix too: AnimateIn on first start
Hi,
This is my testing code for AnimateCSS for `show()`, `hide()`,
`updateDom()`
Naturally, we have to do better !
I voluntarily modify `newsfeed` and `compliments` in order to test
Note: I will correct checks later... it's a test...
---------
Co-authored-by: bugsounet <bugsounet@bugsounet.fr>
Co-authored-by: veeck <michael.veeck@nebenan.de>
While waiting for the easterbunny I cleaned up some bad coding practice
:-)
Very open for comments especially regarding the places I commented
myself...
---------
Co-authored-by: veeck <michael@veeck.de>
We have used it inconsistently till now. Template literals are more
modern and easier to maintain in my opinion.
Because that's a large amount of changes, here's a way to reproduce it:
I added the rule `"prefer-template": "error"` to the `.eslintrc.json`
and did an autofix. Since this caused a new problem in line 409 of
`newsfeed.js`, I reversed it in that line and also removed the rule from
the eslint config file.
The rule is described here:
https://eslint.org/docs/latest/rules/prefer-template
Note: I've played around with some other linter rules as well, and some
seem to point to some specific, non-cosmetic, issues. But before I dive
even deeper and then introduce even bigger and hardly understandable
changes at once, I thought I'd start with this simple cosmetic rule.
