In the latest versions of ESLint, more and more formatting rules were
removed or declared deprecated. These rules have been integrated into
the new Stylistic package (https://eslint.style/guide/why) and expanded.
Stylistic acts as a better formatter for JavaScript as Prettier.
With this PR there are many changes that make the code more uniform, but
it may be difficult to review due to the large amount. Even if I have no
worries about the changes, perhaps this would be something for the
release after next.
Let me know what you think.
We have used it inconsistently till now. Template literals are more
modern and easier to maintain in my opinion.
Because that's a large amount of changes, here's a way to reproduce it:
I added the rule `"prefer-template": "error"` to the `.eslintrc.json`
and did an autofix. Since this caused a new problem in line 409 of
`newsfeed.js`, I reversed it in that line and also removed the rule from
the eslint config file.
The rule is described here:
https://eslint.org/docs/latest/rules/prefer-template
Note: I've played around with some other linter rules as well, and some
seem to point to some specific, non-cosmetic, issues. But before I dive
even deeper and then introduce even bigger and hardly understandable
changes at once, I thought I'd start with this simple cosmetic rule.
Fixes#2953
This is an attempt to fix the issue with precipitation amount and
percentage mixup. I have created a separate
`precipitationPercentage`-variable where the probability of rain can be
stored.
The config options now has the old `showPrecipitationAmount` in addition
to a new setting: `showPrecipitationProbability` (shows the likelihood
of rain).
<details>
<summary>Examples</summary>
### Yr
I tested the Yr weather provider for a Norwegian city Bergen that has a
lot of rain. I have removed properties that are irrelevant for this demo
from the config-samples below.
Config:
```js
{
module: "weather",
config: {
weatherProvider: "yr",
type: "current",
showPrecipitationAmount: true,
showPrecipitationProbability: true
}
},
{
module: "weather",
config: {
weatherProvider: "yr",
type: "hourly",
showPrecipitationAmount: true,
showPrecipitationProbability: true
}
},
{
module: "weather",
config: {
weatherProvider: "yr",
type: "daily",
showPrecipitationAmount: true,
showPrecipitationProbability: true
}
}
```
Result:<br/>
<img width="444" alt="screenshot"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/34011212/216775423-4e37345c-f915-47e5-8551-7c544ebd24b1.png">
</details>
---------
Co-authored-by: Magnus Marthinsen <magmar@online.no>
Co-authored-by: Veeck <github@veeck.de>
Fixes so the Yr weather direction is not inverted. This error was
[reported in the
community](https://forum.magicmirror.builders/topic/17561/wind-direction-180-degrees-twisted-at-yr).
I misunderstood when developing the module because of the wind direction
arrow was pointing opposite to the arrow displayed on Yr.no. I renamed
the variable to help other developers in the future.
Co-authored-by: Magnus Marthinsen <magmar@online.no>
Co-authored-by: veeck <michael@veeck.de>
So finally I think this refactorin is ready to be reviewed :-)
DONE:
- [x] Removed all conversion functions for wind and temperature from
specific weatherproviders
- [x] Use internally only metric units: celsius for temperature, meters
per seconds for wind
- [x] Convert temp and wind into the configured units when displaying
data on the UI
- [x] look how beaufort calculation uses metrics, added knots as new
windunit
- [x] add more e2e tests
Checked providers:
- [x] Darksky
- [x] EnvCanada
- [x] OpenWeatherMap
- [x] SMHI provider
- [x] UK Met Office
- [x] UK Met Office DataHub
- [x] WeatherBit
- [x] WeatherFlow
- [x] WeatherGov
TODO in different tickets:
- check weatherproviders for usage of weatherEndpoint (as seen in
https://github.com/MichMich/MagicMirror-Documentation/issues/131) -> see
#2926
- cleanup precipations -> #2953
Co-authored-by: veeck <michael@veeck.de>
small update to the fetchData method to use the fetch helper instead of
the old XCMLHttpRequest.
Also fixes some typos :-)
Co-authored-by: veeck <michael@veeck.de>
This PR addresses [this
comment](48756e8774 (commitcomment-85772193)),
which points out an issue with #2902.
Looks like the apparent temp calculation method was incorrectly
referenced 😅
