mirror of
https://github.com/asterisk/asterisk.git
synced 2025-11-10 20:08:16 +00:00
Split caching out from the stasis_caching_topic.
In working with res_stasis, I discovered a significant limitation to
the current structure of stasis_caching_topics: you cannot subscribe
to cache updates for a single channel/bridge/endpoint/etc.
To address this, this patch splits the cache away from the
stasis_caching_topic, making it a first class object. The stasis_cache
object is shared amongst individual stasis_caching_topics that are
created per channel/endpoint/etc. These are still forwarded to global
whatever_all_cached topics, so their use from most of the code does
not change.
In making these changes, I noticed that we frequently used a similar
pattern for bridges, endpoints and channels:
single_topic ----------------> all_topic
^
|
single_topic_cached ----+----> all_topic_cached
|
+----> cache
This pattern was extracted as the 'Stasis Caching Pattern', defined in
stasis_caching_pattern.h. This avoids a lot of duplicate code between
the different domain objects.
Since the cache is now disassociated from its upstream caching topics,
this also necessitated a change to how the 'guaranteed' flag worked
for retrieving from a cache. The code for handling the caching
guarantee was extracted into a 'stasis_topic_wait' function, which
works for any stasis_topic.
(closes issue ASTERISK-22002)
Review: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2672/
git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk@395954 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
This commit is contained in:
@@ -49,7 +49,11 @@ static void endpoint_state_cb(void *data, struct stasis_subscription *sub,
|
||||
struct stasis_topic *topic,
|
||||
struct stasis_message *message)
|
||||
{
|
||||
stasis_forward_message(ast_manager_get_topic(), stasis_caching_get_topic(ast_endpoint_topic_all_cached()), message);
|
||||
/* XXX This looks wrong. Nothing should post or forward to a caching
|
||||
* topic directly. Maybe ast_endpoint_topic() would be correct? I'd have
|
||||
* to dig to make sure I don't break anything, though.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
stasis_forward_message(ast_manager_get_topic(), ast_endpoint_topic_all_cached(), message);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int manager_endpoints_init(void)
|
||||
@@ -64,7 +68,7 @@ int manager_endpoints_init(void)
|
||||
|
||||
ast_register_atexit(manager_endpoints_shutdown);
|
||||
|
||||
endpoint_topic = stasis_caching_get_topic(ast_endpoint_topic_all_cached());
|
||||
endpoint_topic = ast_endpoint_topic_all_cached();
|
||||
if (!endpoint_topic) {
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user