https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.4
........
r136726 | murf | 2008-08-07 18:15:34 -0600 (Thu, 07 Aug 2008) | 32 lines
(closes issue #13236)
Reported by: korihor
Wow, this one was a challenge!
I regrouped and ran a new strategy for
setting the ~~MACRO~~ value; I set it once
per extension, up near the top. It is only
set if there is a switch in the extension.
So, I had to put in a chunk of code to detect
a switch in the pval tree.
I moved the code to insert the set of ~~exten~~
up to the beginning of the gen_prios routine,
instead of down in the switch code.
I learned that I have to push the detection
of the switches down into the code, so everywhere
I create a new exten in gen_prios, I make sure
to pass onto it the values of the mother_exten
first, and the exten next.
I had to add a couple fields to the exten
struct to accomplish this, in the ael_structs.h
file. The checked field makes it so we don't
repeat the switch search if it's been done.
I also updated the regressions.
........
git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk@136746 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.4
........
r111341 | murf | 2008-03-26 21:21:05 -0600 (Wed, 26 Mar 2008) | 15 lines
(closes issue #12302)
Reported by: pj
Tested by: murf
These changes will set a channel variable ~~EXTEN~~ just before generating code
for a switch, with the value of ${EXTEN}. The exten is marked as having a switch,
and ever after that, till the end of the exten, we substitute any ${EXTEN}
with ${~~EXTEN~~} instead in application arguments; (and the ${EXTEN: also).
The reason for this, is that because switches are coded using
separate extensions to provide pattern matching, and
jumping to/from these switch extensions messes up the ${EXTEN} value,
which blows the minds of users.
........
git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk@111360 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
