https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.8
........
r292741 | mmichelson | 2010-10-22 12:09:52 -0500 (Fri, 22 Oct 2010) | 12 lines
Prevent multiple runs of event_sub_test from producing false failure results.
The array of test subscriptions was declared "static," meaning that the
data.count field would retain its value between runs of the test. After the
first test run, this would result in false reports of test failures.
I chose to just remove the "static" keyword from the structure since it's not
a huge deal to construct this structure during each run of the test. Another
alternative would have been to zero out the data.count fields of each test
subscription instead.
........
git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk@292742 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
This patch introduces another test in test_event.c that exercises most of the
subscription related ast_event API calls. I made some minor additions to the
existing event allocation test to increase API coverage by the test code.
Finally, I made a list in a comment of API calls not yet touched by the test
module as a to-do list for future test development.
During the development of this test code, I discovered a number of bugs in
the event API.
1) subscriptions to AST_EVENT_ALL were not handled appropriately in a couple
of different places. The API allows a subscription to all event types,
but with IE parameters, just as if it was a subscription to a specific
event type. However, the parameters were being ignored. This affected
ast_event_check_subscriber() and event distribution to subscribers.
2) Some of the logic in ast_event_check_subscriber() for checking subscriptions
against query parameters was wrong.
Review: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/617/
git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk@258632 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
This module includes a single test so far that creates events using two
different methods and does some verification on the result to make sure
the correct data can be retrieved from the event that was created.
One bug was found in the event API while developing this test, which makes
me happy. :-)
Review: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/495/
git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk@246260 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
